Knowledge · Guide
Cross-flow or enthalpy: which design fits?
Cross-flow transfers heat, enthalpy transfers moisture as well. The comparison shows the strengths, limits and selection criteria of both designs.
Both designs sit in the same housing principle - a plate stack with two separate flow paths. The difference lies in the plate itself: solid in the cross-flow unit, vapour-permeable in the enthalpy exchanger. Different fields of use follow from that.
What does the cross-flow plate heat exchanger do?
The cross-flow exchanger transfers sensible heat only. Its strengths:
- Strict separation: nothing from the exhaust air reaches the supply air - a precondition for loaded, odorous or process-related extract air.
- Free choice of material: aluminium, coated, stainless steel or plastic - the plate may be anything that is tight. That also covers hot or corrosive extract air.
- Cleanability: smooth metal plates can be cleaned; for process exhaust air carrying dust or grease this is the decisive point.
Its price: in winter a good deal of condensate occurs, and the recovered air is dry - indoor humidity falls.
What does the enthalpy exchanger do differently?
Its membrane lets water vapour through while keeping the air streams apart. It therefore transfers sensible AND latent heat:
- Humidity recovery: the supply air arrives less dry in winter - relevant for offices and homes, museums, anything with a comfort or humidity requirement.
- Less condensate and freezing risk: what passes into the supply air as vapour cannot freeze on the plate.
- Summer operation: in cooled buildings the membrane keeps part of the outdoor humidity outside and relieves the cooling plant.
Its limits: the membrane does not tolerate aggressive or greasy extract air, cannot be cleaned abrasively and is limited in temperature. For process exhaust air, cross-flow remains the choice.
Side by side
| Criterion | Cross-flow | Enthalpy |
|---|---|---|
| Transfer | heat only | heat + moisture |
| Separation | complete | air separated, water vapour diffuses |
| Materials | 4 materials up to stainless/plastic | membrane (fixed design) |
| Loaded process air | suitable (material selectable) | not suitable |
| Condensate in winter | plenty, drain required | considerably less |
| Freezing risk | present, strategy required | reduced by design |
| Typical use | industry, process, halls | offices, housing, comfort ventilation |
How to decide?
Two questions usually suffice: may moisture pass into the supply air - and what does the exhaust air carry? Comfort ventilation without loaded extract air speaks for enthalpy; process, kitchen or hot exhaust air for cross-flow with a suitable material. In the configurator you do not have to commit in advance: without a restriction the sizing calculates both designs and shows what each achieves under your requirements.
Size it now instead of reading on?
Enter volume flows, temperatures and humidities - the configurator calculates live and you receive an individual quote.